• Pages

  • Archive Index
  • Comment Policy
  • Declaration of Independence
  • Social Networking
  • What Is The Liberty Papers?
  • The U.S. Constitution

• Contributors

  • Brad Warbiany
  • Chris
  • Doug Mataconis
  • Kevin
  • Michael O. Powell
  • Mike
  • Quincy
  • Simon Jester
  • Stephen Gordon
  • Stephen Littau
  • tarran

• Retired

  • Adam Selene
  • Eric (our Founder)
  • Jason Pye
  • Kay
  • Nick
  • Robert
  • UCrawford
• Blog Admin: E-mail Brad

• Search The Liberty Papers

  WWW thelibertypapers.org

• Recent Comments:
  • Chris: Uhhh… yes, and? You say that as if it wasn’t either explicit or intentional. I quite clearly...
  • Seerak: As described here, “ideology̶ 1; is indistinguishable from “faith”.
  • Stephen Littau: Thanks Doug! I haven’t had a chance to read over the opinion; I’m sure there is much more...
  • Doug Mataconis: The media is not reporting this decision entirely accurately, or at least not reporting what it means...
  • Stephen Littau: Thanks Grammar Nazi and Bob. I used the wrong word. http://www.merriam-w ebster.com/dictio...
  • Bob: Did you mean “infamous̶ 1;? If so why?
  • Grammar Nazi: I think you mean “famous” rather than “infamous̶ 1;. Or maybe not. Great post!
  • thomasblair: Great post. I’d never listened to the entire speech, but after that excerpt (which I’d also...
  • Brad Warbiany: tarran, As recently as 1978 the Mormons believed that blacks were unfit for the priesthood. If you...
  • Brad Warbiany: David, Thanks for stopping by, and [I'm sure you hear this quite a bit] great work on The Machinery of...
• Categories
  • Abortion
  • Activism
  • Admin
  • Affirmative Action
  • Anti-Trust
  • Blog Discussions
  • Blogroll
  • Business
  • Carnivals
  • Civil Liberties
    • Know Your Rights
  • Comment Of The Day
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Constitution
    • Commerce Clause
    • Federalism
    • Individual Rights
      • Free Speech
      • Freedom of Association
      • Freedom of the press
      • Intellectual Property Rights
      • Keep and Bear Arms
        • District of Columbia v. Heller
      • Privacy
      • Property Rights
        • Castle Doctrine
        • Zoning and Land-Use
      • Religious Liberty
      • Reproductive Rights
      • The Bill Of Rights
        • Church and State
      • The War on Drugs
    • Separation Of Powers
  • Corruption
  • Criminal Justice Reform
  • Culture
  • Democracy
  • Doublespeak
  • Draft
  • Dumbasses and Authoritarians
  • Economics
    • Credit Crisis
    • Currency and Monetary Policy
    • Energy Policy
    • Inflation
    • Monopolies
    • Unions
  • Education
  • Election '08
  • Election '10
  • Election '12
  • Elections
    • Election Law
      • Ballot Access
      • Petitions
  • Environment
  • Equal Protection
  • Fascism in America
  • Federal Reserve
  • Fiscal Policy
  • Foreign Affairs
  • Founding Fathers
  • Free Trade
  • Freedom
  • General
  • Government Incompetence
  • Government Regulation
    • Government Ethics
    • Government Transparency
  • Government Waste
  • Guest Blogging
  • Healthcare
  • History
  • Hope n' Change
  • Hubris
  • Huckabee Watch
  • Human Rights
  • Humor
  • Immigration
  • Legal
    • Crime and Punishment
      • Death Penalty
      • Mandatory Minimum Sentences
  • Liberty
  • Liberty Rock
  • Licensing
  • live blogging
  • Look About
  • Media
  • Military
  • Monetary Issues
  • Multimedia
  • Non-Intervention
  • Occupy Wall Street
  • Off Topic
  • Open Thread
  • Point/Counterpoint
  • Police Watch
  • Political Correctness
  • Politics
    • Democrats
    • Exclusive 2008 Libertarian National Convention Coverage
    • Independents
    • Libertarians
    • Republicans
  • Press Release
  • Quote of the Day
  • racism
  • Random
  • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Movie Reviews
  • Security
  • Sex
  • Simon Says
  • Socialism
  • Strategies For Advancing Liberty
  • Supreme Court
  • Taxation
  • Tea Party
  • Technology
  • The Contributors
  • The Nanny State
  • The Surveillance State
  • The Welfare State
  • Theory and Ideas
  • torture
  • Tweet Of The Day
  • War on Terror
• Archives
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
• Meta
  •  RSS 2.0 Feed
  •  RSS 2.0 Comments Feed
• Stats and Stuff
  
  NetworkedBlogs

  Blog:

  The Liberty Papers

  Topics:

  politics, libertarian

  Follow my blog

January 16, 2009

1 Comment

1. I wonder how many of the people who oppose to legalizing marijuana would also support a ban on all tobacco products. Would they support a resurrection of the 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act?

   I’d ask anyone who would support a ban on marijuana, alcohol, or tobacco – but not all three – to help me understand their logic. Conversely, if one is okay, why not all? How do they differ?

   Comment by Akston — January 16, 2009 @ 9:57 pm

Comments RSS

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.