<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tenth Amendment victory?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/05/a-tenth-amendment-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/05/a-tenth-amendment-victory/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/05/a-tenth-amendment-victory/#comment-63202</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3905#comment-63202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Obama pardon all the people arrested under federal charges in these states since 1/20/09?
If the head of the DEA needs to be replaced before the president bothers ordering them to &quot;stand down&quot;, he could at LEAST issue pardons for the people caught up in the in-between time period.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Obama pardon all the people arrested under federal charges in these states since 1/20/09?<br />
If the head of the DEA needs to be replaced before the president bothers ordering them to &#8220;stand down&#8221;, he could at LEAST issue pardons for the people caught up in the in-between time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/05/a-tenth-amendment-victory/#comment-63197</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3905#comment-63197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how it doesn&#039;t note that the raids were actually a Clinton policy holdover; or that in fact most of the senior officials in the DEA are Clinton era appointees as well. 

Doesn&#039;t fit the narrative I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how it doesn&#8217;t note that the raids were actually a Clinton policy holdover; or that in fact most of the senior officials in the DEA are Clinton era appointees as well. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t fit the narrative I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/05/a-tenth-amendment-victory/#comment-63193</link>
		<dc:creator>Akston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=3905#comment-63193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; The Democrat is more for “state’s rights” (I don’t like that term) than his Republican predecessor. Who would of bet on that?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I prefer to call it &quot;State&#039;s Powers&quot;.

Sadly, I can&#039;t bet on any stance for the bulk of the Republican Party in its current incarnation.  I guess we&#039;d have to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/03/swing-vote-on-the-economic-stimulus/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ask Joe the Plumber&lt;/a&gt; what they say they stand for now.  If they ever actually take action towards limited government again, I might bet on them again.

And though I often rail against President Obama&#039;s economic positions, I want to go on record as supporting him on this.  I&#039;ll take any progress towards freedom I can get these days.  Of course I have to add the small caveat that this is simply a promise, not an actual deed.  But President Obama seems to be starting with follow-through in other areas, so I have hope.

I&#039;m sure he&#039;d be happy to hear that.

Now if I could just hope for less of a train wreck on &quot;economic solutions&quot;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> The Democrat is more for “state’s rights” (I don’t like that term) than his Republican predecessor. Who would of bet on that?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I prefer to call it &#8220;State&#8217;s Powers&#8221;.</p>
<p>Sadly, I can&#8217;t bet on any stance for the bulk of the Republican Party in its current incarnation.  I guess we&#8217;d have to <a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/02/03/swing-vote-on-the-economic-stimulus/" rel="nofollow">ask Joe the Plumber</a> what they say they stand for now.  If they ever actually take action towards limited government again, I might bet on them again.</p>
<p>And though I often rail against President Obama&#8217;s economic positions, I want to go on record as supporting him on this.  I&#8217;ll take any progress towards freedom I can get these days.  Of course I have to add the small caveat that this is simply a promise, not an actual deed.  But President Obama seems to be starting with follow-through in other areas, so I have hope.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d be happy to hear that.</p>
<p>Now if I could just hope for less of a train wreck on &#8220;economic solutions&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
