The Republicans angered the Left by spending “welfare” money on wars so the Democrats feel perfectly justified in their school yard antics of spending “military” money on “welfare”…even if there is no money to spend…

And that’s why the message of the Tea Parties is dangerous to both parties. The debate in Washington is always on how the money should be spent, not whether it should be spent at all. Now, a group of “uppity” taxpayers are getting together and trying to stop the spending.

It’s no wonder Axelrod thinks the Tea Parties are “unhealthy”. They break up a very carefully crafted bi-partisan narrative.

I rather feel this whole thng is all about tit for tat.The Republicans angered the Left by spending “welfare” money on wars so the Democrats feel perfectly justified in their school yard antics of spending “military” money on “welfare”…even if there is no money to spend…

It’s not a misconception. It’s a deliberate argument to make it look like Tea Partiers are complaining about nothing. See my open letter post below on this.

By the way I fail to see why you guys are always picking on the Repbulicans who are indeed the more fiscally conservative party arter all. While Obama’s Democrats are spending ludicrous amounts of money which hasn’t been yet earned by people who have yet to exist, the Republicans only spent insane amounts of money leveraged against money borrowed from those who could never pay it back.

There is a huge distinction there you know…

Obama loved protests attacking Bush. He’ll love them attacking the next GOP President. But while they’re attacking him? Not so much.

And my whopping $13? Yeah…I can “stimulate” the fast food industry? Gee thanks.

I guess that dissent that lies is healthy, while dissent that tells the truth is to be attacked in the cloudcuckooland of the far Left.