<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alan Keyes teams up with Prison Planet to start new conspiracy theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66431</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle ,

Just curious.
I know that thermite is a mixture of aluminum and ferrous oxide (rust), but what is &quot;active thermite&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle ,</p>
<p>Just curious.<br />
I know that thermite is a mixture of aluminum and ferrous oxide (rust), but what is &#8220;active thermite&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66426</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merf</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66421</link>
		<dc:creator>Merf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s just it, APMA.  September 11 IS solved.  And yes, every building that collapsed or had to be condemned afterward has been explained to my satisfaction.

Honestly, if there was any room for speculation, do you really think that the MSM would have let it slide?  I mean, under Clinton, sure, under Obama, without a doubt, but during Bush&#039;s watch?  If there had been anything, they hate him enough to never let go of it.

And yes, we really did walk on the moon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just it, APMA.  September 11 IS solved.  And yes, every building that collapsed or had to be condemned afterward has been explained to my satisfaction.</p>
<p>Honestly, if there was any room for speculation, do you really think that the MSM would have let it slide?  I mean, under Clinton, sure, under Obama, without a doubt, but during Bush&#8217;s watch?  If there had been anything, they hate him enough to never let go of it.</p>
<p>And yes, we really did walk on the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66416</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK Merf, so the fact that 9/11 is very much an open unsolved case means nothing to you. When 9/11 is the cornerstone of US foreign policy consisting of two wars with ill defined goals and the growing domestic police state represented by the Department of Homeland Security, TSA etc etc... 

You are an idiot. Do you even have any explanation for the collapse of WTC7? Do you even know what I&#039;m describing here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Merf, so the fact that 9/11 is very much an open unsolved case means nothing to you. When 9/11 is the cornerstone of US foreign policy consisting of two wars with ill defined goals and the growing domestic police state represented by the Department of Homeland Security, TSA etc etc&#8230; </p>
<p>You are an idiot. Do you even have any explanation for the collapse of WTC7? Do you even know what I&#8217;m describing here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merf</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66395</link>
		<dc:creator>Merf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle, I have a question for you -- If Stephen Gordon is nothing, the why are you wasting any time or effort posting in this blog?

I feel the same way about your conspiracy theories as you do about mine, but you will not find me in any of the blogs you love so much, because your thoughts and ideas have no value to me, and I do not waste my time with nothingness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle, I have a question for you &#8212; If Stephen Gordon is nothing, the why are you wasting any time or effort posting in this blog?</p>
<p>I feel the same way about your conspiracy theories as you do about mine, but you will not find me in any of the blogs you love so much, because your thoughts and ideas have no value to me, and I do not waste my time with nothingness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66394</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherPatheticMindlessArticle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It&#039;s all a big conspiracy theory&quot; has to be the biggest intellectual cop-out anyone who pretends to be a journalist can make. 

Does the writer even know anything about the recently discovered active thermite in four samples of the dust from 9/11? 

I doubt it. It&#039;s so much easier to be a wimp and make lame unoriginal jokes and pretend to be enlightened. You are nothing Stephen Gordon. Just a pathetic blog vomiter who thinks parroting the official media line is an intellectual exercise. 

Why don&#039;t you try doing some research of your own and try explaining the inconsistencies in the official version of events of 9/11 yourself? Where is Osama Bin Laden? Why is there no hard evidence linking Al Qaeda to 9/11? What IS Al Qaeda? Can you describe the composition of Al Qaeda and how it is organized? How could a small group of Arabs manage to penetrate the defenses of the most heavily defended airspace in the world with a few boxcutters? What is PNAC and what were they talking about when they said the US needs a revolution in military affairs and a &quot;catastrophic, catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor&quot; to achieve it? 

I bet you can&#039;t answer a single one of those questions with any clarity because you are a dunce and a pretender. 

It is you that believes in ridiculous conspiracy theories if you believe in the shadowy and pervasive organization of Islamic extremists commonly known as Al Qaeda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all a big conspiracy theory&#8221; has to be the biggest intellectual cop-out anyone who pretends to be a journalist can make. </p>
<p>Does the writer even know anything about the recently discovered active thermite in four samples of the dust from 9/11? </p>
<p>I doubt it. It&#8217;s so much easier to be a wimp and make lame unoriginal jokes and pretend to be enlightened. You are nothing Stephen Gordon. Just a pathetic blog vomiter who thinks parroting the official media line is an intellectual exercise. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you try doing some research of your own and try explaining the inconsistencies in the official version of events of 9/11 yourself? Where is Osama Bin Laden? Why is there no hard evidence linking Al Qaeda to 9/11? What IS Al Qaeda? Can you describe the composition of Al Qaeda and how it is organized? How could a small group of Arabs manage to penetrate the defenses of the most heavily defended airspace in the world with a few boxcutters? What is PNAC and what were they talking about when they said the US needs a revolution in military affairs and a &#8220;catastrophic, catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor&#8221; to achieve it? </p>
<p>I bet you can&#8217;t answer a single one of those questions with any clarity because you are a dunce and a pretender. </p>
<p>It is you that believes in ridiculous conspiracy theories if you believe in the shadowy and pervasive organization of Islamic extremists commonly known as Al Qaeda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-66111</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 03:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-66111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too filed suit only I did so before any primary was held - April of 2007. The vote is the equal protection and due process issue  or point of law that birthed us as a new nation. I legally argued: WE UNFOUNDED OURSELVES. 

Thus I may be the only actual Independent in this nation as you are not actually and legally independent if you belong to a party or have legal representation. 

I am an expert in constitutional law as I became the very first person since William Marbury to enter SCOTUS directly on 11/20/08 but you do not know as you failed to do your duty as a citizen and as this was suppressed as the people were circumvented by SCOTUS as the Solicitor general failed to respond to my petition, a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction. Then SCOTUS acted upon an emergency application addressing the breach of contract but did so w/o getting any response for the SG and w/o ever filing the paperwork! Marbury V Madison says ACTING not delivery or filing of the paper counts and is proof. 

This controversy is about much more than Obama&#039;s birth plus what the Obama camp has produced is not a birth certificate but a certificate of live birth which proves beyond a reasonable doubt only that you were born and were able to prove you are entitled to some benefits not that you were actually born within the US. YOU are proof beyond any and all doubt you were actually born; that paper called a certificate of live birth? It entitles you to some benefits of American citizenship like casting a vote or collecting social security but not to the benefit known as the protected right to become the elected President and Commander. 

Alan Keyes is not crazy or wrong but he is not arguing the correct point of law. Nobody is except myself. 

I sued all 300 million Americans and cited TREASON as all votes are not constitutional any more than any and all actions are constitutional and in some cases those actions constitute what is treason. I said Who cares if Obama was or was not born here? If he is an expert in constitutional law as he claims it is treason as this election was bought with private funds; the power known as Executive Order or our vote was openly purchased and Obama did this with deliberation and forethought; with intent as he had a copy of my suit thus owned the knowledge as early as June of 2007.

This is actually about the discrimination of women, a two party monopoly that controls and exploits the process,  a legislative branch that has skewed all power in its favor, a past President suffering zero consequences for what is a crime - perjury, chain of command being completely severed and endemic corruption within every branch of government as unless you agree to act unethically opportunity is made nonexistent for you. I have breaking new for you:

No matter how you add it up, according to the exact words of our law, math and Marbury BUSH V GORE SITS AS A TIED DECISION THAT I RESOLVED IN MY FAVOR THUS IN FAVOR OF ALL LAW ABIDING, ETHICAL CITIZENS. The spirit of our law not the exact words is Chief Justice Rehnquist could act in our best interest and so fudge the math and erroneously invoke the power of one in such a fashion the Justices were then voting twice, not once. Per Curium is never used in SCOTUS as the math does not always add up! Besides one vote? The only forms of the power of one SCOTUS may ever invoke is unanimous or one alone, a Chief Justice acting alone to stand down a sitting President. 

You can read my SCOTUS petition, federal suit and a copy of my brief now within Federal Appeals at

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14231589/Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal 

&amp;

http://nullandvoidobama.wordpress.com/  

I say to all Johnny come too latelys:

RIGHT THING, CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, BUT WRONG REASONING and to all citizens:

You might personally believe you can take a popular vote and so vote to violate my fully vested, constitutionally protected rights but you would be wrong as US law is not a popularity contest but a matter of overcoming peer pressure and so willing yourself to power, actual power and not perceived power. It is not possible to win a Revolution if you do it via lying, cheating and stealing as you never truly own the &#039;victory&#039;. All you own is GUILT and all you achieve or cause is MORE INJUSTICE. 

As for those of you who call this a race issue? 

Barack Obama claiming he knows what it is liek to feel black aka feel like a victim in KENYA, INDONESIA or HAWAII where white is the minority is like me claiming I felt white in Norway or at a Klan meeting. The color black, the outside appearance, is deceptive as it is relative and so not the whole truth. WOMAN is not an outside appearance but a quality of being human as all men are biologically the same while men and women are biologically different. If black actually made a difference and caused justice? Was an actual reason to violate the terms of our law w/o equal protection or due process? 

A black man named Thurgood Marshall would have secured justice for women as the promise of Brown will NEVER be realized unless we stop injuring the mothers of those children. BARACK OBAMA proves Brown V Topeka secured legal power for black men only but not for black women. WOMAN is yet the only injured class and the injury to them is yet &#039;made legal&#039; by men who refuse to apply the law to them equally or at all. 

WHO is my co-counsel of record? Thurgood Marshal as he said in Rotsker V Goldberg: Are we ruling against women only as a mostly male Congress will refuse to obey the law? Or our ruling? Are we afraid? Are we giving constitutional authority or custody, care and control of women to men in violation of US law? 

YES!!!!! In America life, not paper, is proof. Paper proves nothing at all and so in my unique case I never need to see the paper and my federal question is: Why are you hiding behind it? If I am brave enough to face the Supreme court of the US all alone, the only woman ever to argue her own case and the only nonlawyer ever to appear, then WHY are you wealthy, privileged men with all the power and resources as well as each other then afraid to do the same? FEAR is unconstitutional as any man who is afraid of liberty and justice cannot possibly keep me or any person safe. You then are unfit to Command or to act President. Proof you are afraid of me, a woman, and unsafe for all Americans is you are acting to suppress the case for equal rights for women, all women and their children of all races and religions.  Last time I checked women gave birth to both girls and boys, or, all humanity, all new baby constitutions. Acting to deny women and their children an exactly named right, safety, and equal or even any protection and process of the law, and acting to deny  all ethical, law abiding Americans liberty then is TREASON as w/o women? Or actual liberty? No justice; no living government of people but only a dead institution. LIBERTY &amp; JUSTICE is the product of people not paper! 

The oath of office is I will preserve the Constitution NOT my lawyer will!!! Those who can fulfill the Presidential oath of office do appear in Federal Court pro se while those who can&#039;t run and hide behind paper and third parties - lawyers and speechwriters. 

Alan Keyes is close but no cigar as he is not acting pro se and he never issued actual Executive Orders SCOTUS then obeyed but I did. I signed them: Susan, the acting, legal President and Commander. 

I ordered SCOTUS to act and so enter me directly; I voided USC 1331 by adjudicating my own case. I never ordered SCOTUS to deliver my commission to you as I gave you more credit than you deserved as obviously none of you know the law or its application or if you do you then do not practice it  or else you would have noticed case # 08-6622 in which the due date of 11/5/08 passed w/o a response by the SG aka the US but then action was taken on 11/20/08 and yet petition 08-6622 was deneid any and all remdy and relief unlike any other authority case in US history. So either I am the legal President as I made my case or John Roberts is a crook as I adressed the never filed application that was acted upon but not conferenced or even considered by the other Justices to him. As my case is airtight? We can reasonably assume Roberts too missed my point of law or a clerk acted and so he never saw the application. Insert joke here as my point of law is:

SCOTUS may not be named in our law as it came to exist as a court of constituional authority but it is the law. The citizens came to mistakenly believe it is a last or final resort when that is not fact, true or correct, or, that they could not defy a ruling of SCOTUS when Marshall said DEFY ME IF NECCESSARY AS IT IS YOUR DUTY OR ELSE YOU ARE LIABLE. How come I knew to defy Marbury V Madison, Bush V Gore, Roberts appointment, USC 1331 and Obama 08 and am successful but none of you did or even thought it is possible??? 

I concluded that you are all guilty but ignorant of the power your one vote actually is as it allows you to defeat all the powers that aren&#039;t  - according to our Declaration and Constitution no matter how high the odds are stacked against you and no matter how disadvantaged you are. I entered SCOTUS directly when that is supposed to be impossible for any person man or woman, citizen or foreigner. All of you are acting upon what is perceived but is not actual. It might be &#039;real&#039; for you but it in no way matches US law or the law of this universe!!!

Two people in all of world history willed themselves to power standing firmly upon just law in word and spirit and so became the LEGAL President and Commander: George Washington and Susan Herbert. William Marbury only became the legal President as he never asked about Commanding and he failed to act ex post facto to then claim his award as Marshall told him to do. Washington and I did act after the fact of our victory. This then is me acting to claim the award made to me on 11/20/08 via official action of SCOTUS. BY ACTING SCOTUS INFORMED YOU, LOL, AS THE SCOTUS DOCKET IS A PUBLIC RECORD AND YOU CANNOT REASONABLY DENY IT EXISTS AND IS ACTUAL AND REAL. YOU ALL HAVE ACCESS TO IT.

Even Alan Keyes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too filed suit only I did so before any primary was held &#8211; April of 2007. The vote is the equal protection and due process issue  or point of law that birthed us as a new nation. I legally argued: WE UNFOUNDED OURSELVES. </p>
<p>Thus I may be the only actual Independent in this nation as you are not actually and legally independent if you belong to a party or have legal representation. </p>
<p>I am an expert in constitutional law as I became the very first person since William Marbury to enter SCOTUS directly on 11/20/08 but you do not know as you failed to do your duty as a citizen and as this was suppressed as the people were circumvented by SCOTUS as the Solicitor general failed to respond to my petition, a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction. Then SCOTUS acted upon an emergency application addressing the breach of contract but did so w/o getting any response for the SG and w/o ever filing the paperwork! Marbury V Madison says ACTING not delivery or filing of the paper counts and is proof. </p>
<p>This controversy is about much more than Obama&#8217;s birth plus what the Obama camp has produced is not a birth certificate but a certificate of live birth which proves beyond a reasonable doubt only that you were born and were able to prove you are entitled to some benefits not that you were actually born within the US. YOU are proof beyond any and all doubt you were actually born; that paper called a certificate of live birth? It entitles you to some benefits of American citizenship like casting a vote or collecting social security but not to the benefit known as the protected right to become the elected President and Commander. </p>
<p>Alan Keyes is not crazy or wrong but he is not arguing the correct point of law. Nobody is except myself. </p>
<p>I sued all 300 million Americans and cited TREASON as all votes are not constitutional any more than any and all actions are constitutional and in some cases those actions constitute what is treason. I said Who cares if Obama was or was not born here? If he is an expert in constitutional law as he claims it is treason as this election was bought with private funds; the power known as Executive Order or our vote was openly purchased and Obama did this with deliberation and forethought; with intent as he had a copy of my suit thus owned the knowledge as early as June of 2007.</p>
<p>This is actually about the discrimination of women, a two party monopoly that controls and exploits the process,  a legislative branch that has skewed all power in its favor, a past President suffering zero consequences for what is a crime &#8211; perjury, chain of command being completely severed and endemic corruption within every branch of government as unless you agree to act unethically opportunity is made nonexistent for you. I have breaking new for you:</p>
<p>No matter how you add it up, according to the exact words of our law, math and Marbury BUSH V GORE SITS AS A TIED DECISION THAT I RESOLVED IN MY FAVOR THUS IN FAVOR OF ALL LAW ABIDING, ETHICAL CITIZENS. The spirit of our law not the exact words is Chief Justice Rehnquist could act in our best interest and so fudge the math and erroneously invoke the power of one in such a fashion the Justices were then voting twice, not once. Per Curium is never used in SCOTUS as the math does not always add up! Besides one vote? The only forms of the power of one SCOTUS may ever invoke is unanimous or one alone, a Chief Justice acting alone to stand down a sitting President. </p>
<p>You can read my SCOTUS petition, federal suit and a copy of my brief now within Federal Appeals at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/14231589/Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/14231589/Herbert-V-Obama-Federal-Appeal</a> </p>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p><a href="http://nullandvoidobama.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://nullandvoidobama.wordpress.com/</a>  </p>
<p>I say to all Johnny come too latelys:</p>
<p>RIGHT THING, CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, BUT WRONG REASONING and to all citizens:</p>
<p>You might personally believe you can take a popular vote and so vote to violate my fully vested, constitutionally protected rights but you would be wrong as US law is not a popularity contest but a matter of overcoming peer pressure and so willing yourself to power, actual power and not perceived power. It is not possible to win a Revolution if you do it via lying, cheating and stealing as you never truly own the &#8216;victory&#8217;. All you own is GUILT and all you achieve or cause is MORE INJUSTICE. </p>
<p>As for those of you who call this a race issue? </p>
<p>Barack Obama claiming he knows what it is liek to feel black aka feel like a victim in KENYA, INDONESIA or HAWAII where white is the minority is like me claiming I felt white in Norway or at a Klan meeting. The color black, the outside appearance, is deceptive as it is relative and so not the whole truth. WOMAN is not an outside appearance but a quality of being human as all men are biologically the same while men and women are biologically different. If black actually made a difference and caused justice? Was an actual reason to violate the terms of our law w/o equal protection or due process? </p>
<p>A black man named Thurgood Marshall would have secured justice for women as the promise of Brown will NEVER be realized unless we stop injuring the mothers of those children. BARACK OBAMA proves Brown V Topeka secured legal power for black men only but not for black women. WOMAN is yet the only injured class and the injury to them is yet &#8216;made legal&#8217; by men who refuse to apply the law to them equally or at all. </p>
<p>WHO is my co-counsel of record? Thurgood Marshal as he said in Rotsker V Goldberg: Are we ruling against women only as a mostly male Congress will refuse to obey the law? Or our ruling? Are we afraid? Are we giving constitutional authority or custody, care and control of women to men in violation of US law? </p>
<p>YES!!!!! In America life, not paper, is proof. Paper proves nothing at all and so in my unique case I never need to see the paper and my federal question is: Why are you hiding behind it? If I am brave enough to face the Supreme court of the US all alone, the only woman ever to argue her own case and the only nonlawyer ever to appear, then WHY are you wealthy, privileged men with all the power and resources as well as each other then afraid to do the same? FEAR is unconstitutional as any man who is afraid of liberty and justice cannot possibly keep me or any person safe. You then are unfit to Command or to act President. Proof you are afraid of me, a woman, and unsafe for all Americans is you are acting to suppress the case for equal rights for women, all women and their children of all races and religions.  Last time I checked women gave birth to both girls and boys, or, all humanity, all new baby constitutions. Acting to deny women and their children an exactly named right, safety, and equal or even any protection and process of the law, and acting to deny  all ethical, law abiding Americans liberty then is TREASON as w/o women? Or actual liberty? No justice; no living government of people but only a dead institution. LIBERTY &amp; JUSTICE is the product of people not paper! </p>
<p>The oath of office is I will preserve the Constitution NOT my lawyer will!!! Those who can fulfill the Presidential oath of office do appear in Federal Court pro se while those who can&#8217;t run and hide behind paper and third parties &#8211; lawyers and speechwriters. </p>
<p>Alan Keyes is close but no cigar as he is not acting pro se and he never issued actual Executive Orders SCOTUS then obeyed but I did. I signed them: Susan, the acting, legal President and Commander. </p>
<p>I ordered SCOTUS to act and so enter me directly; I voided USC 1331 by adjudicating my own case. I never ordered SCOTUS to deliver my commission to you as I gave you more credit than you deserved as obviously none of you know the law or its application or if you do you then do not practice it  or else you would have noticed case # 08-6622 in which the due date of 11/5/08 passed w/o a response by the SG aka the US but then action was taken on 11/20/08 and yet petition 08-6622 was deneid any and all remdy and relief unlike any other authority case in US history. So either I am the legal President as I made my case or John Roberts is a crook as I adressed the never filed application that was acted upon but not conferenced or even considered by the other Justices to him. As my case is airtight? We can reasonably assume Roberts too missed my point of law or a clerk acted and so he never saw the application. Insert joke here as my point of law is:</p>
<p>SCOTUS may not be named in our law as it came to exist as a court of constituional authority but it is the law. The citizens came to mistakenly believe it is a last or final resort when that is not fact, true or correct, or, that they could not defy a ruling of SCOTUS when Marshall said DEFY ME IF NECCESSARY AS IT IS YOUR DUTY OR ELSE YOU ARE LIABLE. How come I knew to defy Marbury V Madison, Bush V Gore, Roberts appointment, USC 1331 and Obama 08 and am successful but none of you did or even thought it is possible??? </p>
<p>I concluded that you are all guilty but ignorant of the power your one vote actually is as it allows you to defeat all the powers that aren&#8217;t  &#8211; according to our Declaration and Constitution no matter how high the odds are stacked against you and no matter how disadvantaged you are. I entered SCOTUS directly when that is supposed to be impossible for any person man or woman, citizen or foreigner. All of you are acting upon what is perceived but is not actual. It might be &#8216;real&#8217; for you but it in no way matches US law or the law of this universe!!!</p>
<p>Two people in all of world history willed themselves to power standing firmly upon just law in word and spirit and so became the LEGAL President and Commander: George Washington and Susan Herbert. William Marbury only became the legal President as he never asked about Commanding and he failed to act ex post facto to then claim his award as Marshall told him to do. Washington and I did act after the fact of our victory. This then is me acting to claim the award made to me on 11/20/08 via official action of SCOTUS. BY ACTING SCOTUS INFORMED YOU, LOL, AS THE SCOTUS DOCKET IS A PUBLIC RECORD AND YOU CANNOT REASONABLY DENY IT EXISTS AND IS ACTUAL AND REAL. YOU ALL HAVE ACCESS TO IT.</p>
<p>Even Alan Keyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Yet another Truther gives the freedom movement some positive media attention</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65867</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Yet another Truther gives the freedom movement some positive media attention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Doug Mataconis: Mark, This is one of those instances where the people who follow Alex Jones reveal the own ignorance... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doug Mataconis: Mark, This is one of those instances where the people who follow Alex Jones reveal the own ignorance&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65855</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, 

This is one of those instances where the people who follow Alex Jones reveal the own ignorance and gullibility.

The &quot;martial law&quot; that the Congressman and Senators referred to has nothing to do with soldiers in the street and everything to do with invoking special rules in Congress that allow legislators to consider bills on the floor immediately.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Under this procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation are swept away.  Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted in the legislation behind closed doors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&amp;id=924

So, you know, get your facts straight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>This is one of those instances where the people who follow Alex Jones reveal the own ignorance and gullibility.</p>
<p>The &#8220;martial law&#8221; that the Congressman and Senators referred to has nothing to do with soldiers in the street and everything to do with invoking special rules in Congress that allow legislators to consider bills on the floor immediately.</p>
<blockquote><p>Under this procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation are swept away.  Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted in the legislation behind closed doors.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&#038;id=924" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&#038;id=924</a></p>
<p>So, you know, get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65846</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen, I regret to inform you that George W. Bush WAS about to martial law.  This was revealed by a few members of Congress as well as Senator Inhofe.  Treasury Secretary mafioso Hank Paulson threatened martial law if Congress didn&#039;t pass the $700 billion banker bailout bill.  Were you asleep during all of that, Stephen?  How sick this is that we have a government which COLLAPSED THE ECONOMY WITH ITS OWN POLICIES THREATEN US WITH MORE DAMAGE BY IMPOSING MARTIAL LAW (as if martial law is the solution to our economic problemss) IF IT COULDN&#039;T FURTHER INFLICT DAMAGE ON THE ECONOMY BY GETTING $700 BILLION FOR THE BANKRUPT BANKING SYSTEM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, I regret to inform you that George W. Bush WAS about to martial law.  This was revealed by a few members of Congress as well as Senator Inhofe.  Treasury Secretary mafioso Hank Paulson threatened martial law if Congress didn&#8217;t pass the $700 billion banker bailout bill.  Were you asleep during all of that, Stephen?  How sick this is that we have a government which COLLAPSED THE ECONOMY WITH ITS OWN POLICIES THREATEN US WITH MORE DAMAGE BY IMPOSING MARTIAL LAW (as if martial law is the solution to our economic problemss) IF IT COULDN&#8217;T FURTHER INFLICT DAMAGE ON THE ECONOMY BY GETTING $700 BILLION FOR THE BANKRUPT BANKING SYSTEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Scams &#124; Comment on Alan Keyes teams up with Prison Planet to start new conspiracy&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65775</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Scams &#124; Comment on Alan Keyes teams up with Prison Planet to start new conspiracy&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Another fellow blogger added an interesting post today on Comment on Alan Keyes teams up with Prison Planet to start new conspiracy&#8230;Here&#8217;s a small readingI don’t care if you agree with alex jones. I want you to agree there are organizations like the CFR, Bliderberg, Trilateral Commissions actually exist. Which MSM says they don’t. Then I want you to agree that they discuss policy there, which they do. Which the MSM says they don’t. Then I want&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another fellow blogger added an interesting post today on Comment on Alan Keyes teams up with Prison Planet to start new conspiracy&#8230;Here&#8217;s a small readingI don’t care if you agree with alex jones. I want you to agree there are organizations like the CFR, Bliderberg, Trilateral Commissions actually exist. Which MSM says they don’t. Then I want you to agree that they discuss policy there, which they do. Which the MSM says they don’t. Then I want&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrisfrmchi</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65773</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrisfrmchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Merf that is a weak answer.

If you took the time to check the first link, you&#039;d have seen a REAL News program detailing what 9 scientists have found and then you could take the time to check this link for the PDF to the research paper that recently came out on Thermite being found in the WTC area.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Are those scientists lying to sell DVDs?

No one checks out these things and then people like you Merf will repeat some general marginalization. 

There needs to be a new investigation.
The government spent more on Lewinsky than 911.

Totally separate subject...NEW WORLD ORDER.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU

Do you know who Henry Kissinger is? And what he does?

Why does he use the same term that President Bush on September 11 1991 said refering to Obama?

What does New World Order Mean?
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1877388,00.html

Cause Time magazine seems to have an Idea.

All those links are from stuff from 2009.

Please just Look up the stuff, VET IT and then comment...maybe make a bigger name for yourself debunking things honestly too.

But you guys can&#039;t deal with that, i&#039;m beginning to see that. 

Just check it out...there is something to all this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Merf that is a weak answer.</p>
<p>If you took the time to check the first link, you&#8217;d have seen a REAL News program detailing what 9 scientists have found and then you could take the time to check this link for the PDF to the research paper that recently came out on Thermite being found in the WTC area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM" rel="nofollow">http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM</a></p>
<p>Are those scientists lying to sell DVDs?</p>
<p>No one checks out these things and then people like you Merf will repeat some general marginalization. </p>
<p>There needs to be a new investigation.<br />
The government spent more on Lewinsky than 911.</p>
<p>Totally separate subject&#8230;NEW WORLD ORDER.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU</a></p>
<p>Do you know who Henry Kissinger is? And what he does?</p>
<p>Why does he use the same term that President Bush on September 11 1991 said refering to Obama?</p>
<p>What does New World Order Mean?<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1877388,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1877388,00.html</a></p>
<p>Cause Time magazine seems to have an Idea.</p>
<p>All those links are from stuff from 2009.</p>
<p>Please just Look up the stuff, VET IT and then comment&#8230;maybe make a bigger name for yourself debunking things honestly too.</p>
<p>But you guys can&#8217;t deal with that, i&#8217;m beginning to see that. </p>
<p>Just check it out&#8230;there is something to all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merf</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65771</link>
		<dc:creator>Merf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give it up, Chris.

Speaking only from the technical aspects of the Alex Jones claims, most of the true believers don&#039;t know enough about petroleum products, metallurgy, engineering, and the mechanics and ballistics of flight to realize how much they don&#039;t know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it up, Chris.</p>
<p>Speaking only from the technical aspects of the Alex Jones claims, most of the true believers don&#8217;t know enough about petroleum products, metallurgy, engineering, and the mechanics and ballistics of flight to realize how much they don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrisfrmchi</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65755</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrisfrmchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep denying things to yourself Doug. 
You don&#039;t want to learn about anything beyond what is comfortable for you in your own private world.

The governments lying to you Doug. 
Its lying to you.

Just check out the information, that goes for all the rest here too.

Its gut check time for you all. 
Its going to get bad this summer, you know this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep denying things to yourself Doug.<br />
You don&#8217;t want to learn about anything beyond what is comfortable for you in your own private world.</p>
<p>The governments lying to you Doug.<br />
Its lying to you.</p>
<p>Just check out the information, that goes for all the rest here too.</p>
<p>Its gut check time for you all.<br />
Its going to get bad this summer, you know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/04/22/alan-keyes-teams-up-with-prison-planet-to-start-new-conspiracy-theory/#comment-65754</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5449#comment-65754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take your meds, Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take your meds, Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
