<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snort!  Guffaw!  Snicker!  LOL!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/07/snort-guffaw-snicker-lol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/07/snort-guffaw-snicker-lol/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/07/snort-guffaw-snicker-lol/#comment-66471</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5702#comment-66471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commander,

I can&#039;t think of a sentiment more wrong than what you just suggested.  Are you saying that someone&#039;s party should come before their principles?  That if they find that their principles have changed enough to cause them to no longer identify with their party, they shouldn&#039;t switch?

In this case, of course, Specter&#039;s principle is *staying in power*, which itself is deplorable and worthy of scorn.  But if he decides that he&#039;s no longer a Republican (something most Republicans criticized him of prior to his switch), do you suggest he should remain with his party rather than change?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commander,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of a sentiment more wrong than what you just suggested.  Are you saying that someone&#8217;s party should come before their principles?  That if they find that their principles have changed enough to cause them to no longer identify with their party, they shouldn&#8217;t switch?</p>
<p>In this case, of course, Specter&#8217;s principle is *staying in power*, which itself is deplorable and worthy of scorn.  But if he decides that he&#8217;s no longer a Republican (something most Republicans criticized him of prior to his switch), do you suggest he should remain with his party rather than change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Commander</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/07/snort-guffaw-snicker-lol/#comment-66459</link>
		<dc:creator>The Commander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5702#comment-66459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You cannot be a traitor asnd remain respected - ask benedict Arnold.  No one has any use for a turncoat - no matter what they say up front.

The remainder of Specter&#039;s career will be &quot;vote with us and shut up&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot be a traitor asnd remain respected &#8211; ask benedict Arnold.  No one has any use for a turncoat &#8211; no matter what they say up front.</p>
<p>The remainder of Specter&#8217;s career will be &#8220;vote with us and shut up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
