<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court &#124; Green Tea Fat Burner</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67531</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court &#124; Green Tea Fat Burner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court   Posted by root 3 hours ago (http://www.thelibertypapers.org)        A certain self proclaimed wise latina woman probably has a rough draft all ready comment by southernjames may 27 2009 3 58 am then he can be one of those fat and content back benchers who talk a good game powered by wordpress template by eric banner 1 3 4        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court   Posted by root 3 hours ago (<a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelibertypapers.org</a>)        A certain self proclaimed wise latina woman probably has a rough draft all ready comment by southernjames may 27 2009 3 58 am then he can be one of those fat and content back benchers who talk a good game powered by wordpress template by eric banner 1 3 4        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | The Liberty Papers Blog Archive California Supreme Court [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southernjames</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67174</link>
		<dc:creator>southernjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For starters, &quot;conservative&quot; is not synonymous with &quot;Republican.&quot;   

There are all sorts of Republicans - including a lot of pro and/or neutral on abortion choice, pro and/or neutral on gay marriage, those very much in favor of bigger government, etc.  And that &quot;moderate&quot; Bush/Colin Powell branch of the party is pretty much in control of it.  As is typified by the nomination of McLame; and hitting closer to home, the national GOP&#039;s support of our big government &quot;moderate&quot; governor Charlie Crist, as a senate nominee.   Charlie is just foaming at the mouth to become a permanant member of the national political ruling class.  Then he can be one of those fat and content back-benchers who talk a good game for a couple months every six years around election time to sucker the rubes; before going back to that penthouse in Georgetown and Livin the Good Life.

As for conservatives, most of them oppose legalizing gay marriage because they happen to perceive, whether misguided or not, that there is more to this issue than just &quot;more&quot; versus &quot;less&quot; freedom.  You can spend a few minutes on the internet and research that one, for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For starters, &#8220;conservative&#8221; is not synonymous with &#8220;Republican.&#8221;   </p>
<p>There are all sorts of Republicans &#8211; including a lot of pro and/or neutral on abortion choice, pro and/or neutral on gay marriage, those very much in favor of bigger government, etc.  And that &#8220;moderate&#8221; Bush/Colin Powell branch of the party is pretty much in control of it.  As is typified by the nomination of McLame; and hitting closer to home, the national GOP&#8217;s support of our big government &#8220;moderate&#8221; governor Charlie Crist, as a senate nominee.   Charlie is just foaming at the mouth to become a permanant member of the national political ruling class.  Then he can be one of those fat and content back-benchers who talk a good game for a couple months every six years around election time to sucker the rubes; before going back to that penthouse in Georgetown and Livin the Good Life.</p>
<p>As for conservatives, most of them oppose legalizing gay marriage because they happen to perceive, whether misguided or not, that there is more to this issue than just &#8220;more&#8221; versus &#8220;less&#8221; freedom.  You can spend a few minutes on the internet and research that one, for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67142</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I beleive the ruling was correct. What I would like to question is why conservatives/Republicans, who say they value freedom, oppose a more free society (one the permits gay mariage)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beleive the ruling was correct. What I would like to question is why conservatives/Republicans, who say they value freedom, oppose a more free society (one the permits gay mariage)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s May, almost June! - Rising up from the Ashes</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67128</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s May, almost June! - Rising up from the Ashes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] all that great. I&#8217;m not an Atheist, but it can affect everyone. It isn&#8217;t the final straw in California, but more advances may delay due to the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all that great. I&#8217;m not an Atheist, but it can affect everyone. It isn&#8217;t the final straw in California, but more advances may delay due to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southernjames</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67115</link>
		<dc:creator>southernjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read it over and over, but I simply can not locate the specific provision of the Constitution that makes gay marriage a constitutional right. 

Hey - I&#039;ve got an idea - perhaps one can be conjured up out of thin air, like the Court in Roe v. Wade did for abortion.  A certain self-proclaimed &quot;wise Latina woman&quot; probably has a rough draft all ready.    A penumbra here, a penumbra there - a pinch of &quot;privacy,&quot; a dash of &quot;equal protection,&quot; and we&#039;re good to go!   Screw the unwashed masses.  What the hell do they know, anyway.   

I amazingly find that the &quot;majority&quot; of voters are &quot;stupid&quot; when my vote is in the minority - but the majority somehow seems less stupid when my vote agrees with theirs - how about you?  For example, 53% of the the people who voted for President this past time around, were either wise, or really stupid, depending on your point of view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read it over and over, but I simply can not locate the specific provision of the Constitution that makes gay marriage a constitutional right. </p>
<p>Hey &#8211; I&#8217;ve got an idea &#8211; perhaps one can be conjured up out of thin air, like the Court in Roe v. Wade did for abortion.  A certain self-proclaimed &#8220;wise Latina woman&#8221; probably has a rough draft all ready.    A penumbra here, a penumbra there &#8211; a pinch of &#8220;privacy,&#8221; a dash of &#8220;equal protection,&#8221; and we&#8217;re good to go!   Screw the unwashed masses.  What the hell do they know, anyway.   </p>
<p>I amazingly find that the &#8220;majority&#8221; of voters are &#8220;stupid&#8221; when my vote is in the minority &#8211; but the majority somehow seems less stupid when my vote agrees with theirs &#8211; how about you?  For example, 53% of the the people who voted for President this past time around, were either wise, or really stupid, depending on your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inDglass</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67098</link>
		<dc:creator>inDglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t supposed to be a democracy! Quite often, the majority of voters are stupid. Prop 8 is a prime example.

Perhaps the ballot should include a constitution quiz. If you don&#039;t pass it, your vote doesn&#039;t count.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t supposed to be a democracy! Quite often, the majority of voters are stupid. Prop 8 is a prime example.</p>
<p>Perhaps the ballot should include a constitution quiz. If you don&#8217;t pass it, your vote doesn&#8217;t count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/26/california-supreme-court-upholds-proposition-8/#comment-67096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=5916#comment-67096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget Maine and Connecticut!

Even though I wish Prop 8 had gone down in flames, part of me is glad that the Court upheld it.  I so want equality, but it shouldn&#039;t come at the expense of democracy; the people need to approve it.  We just need to work harder to help them see the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Maine and Connecticut!</p>
<p>Even though I wish Prop 8 had gone down in flames, part of me is glad that the Court upheld it.  I so want equality, but it shouldn&#8217;t come at the expense of democracy; the people need to approve it.  We just need to work harder to help them see the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
