<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discretionary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/#comment-68461</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6437#comment-68461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed with TerryP.  &quot;Non-discretionary spending&quot; is basically entitlement spending (medicare, medicaid, social security).  This isn&#039;t paid for by appropriations of Congress, but rather pre-determined according to the rules of the plan.

This doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be changed (i.e. given life expectancy, Congress could mandate a retirement age for SS/Medicare benefits of 72 years instead of the current), but it&#039;s not something that is decided to be spent or not spent on a normal Congressional budget process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with TerryP.  &#8220;Non-discretionary spending&#8221; is basically entitlement spending (medicare, medicaid, social security).  This isn&#8217;t paid for by appropriations of Congress, but rather pre-determined according to the rules of the plan.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t be changed (i.e. given life expectancy, Congress could mandate a retirement age for SS/Medicare benefits of 72 years instead of the current), but it&#8217;s not something that is decided to be spent or not spent on a normal Congressional budget process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerryP</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/#comment-68459</link>
		<dc:creator>TerryP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6437#comment-68459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non-deiscretionary spending or entitlement spending is so high because it is on autopilot.  It goes up no matter what.  There are no votes in congress each year to vote on the spending unlike the discretionary spending.  This is why our economic problems will just get worse with SS, medicare, medicaid and other entitlement programs just on autopilot the spending for these will just keep increasing overtaking everything else and demolishing our economy in the process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non-deiscretionary spending or entitlement spending is so high because it is on autopilot.  It goes up no matter what.  There are no votes in congress each year to vote on the spending unlike the discretionary spending.  This is why our economic problems will just get worse with SS, medicare, medicaid and other entitlement programs just on autopilot the spending for these will just keep increasing overtaking everything else and demolishing our economy in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/#comment-68440</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6437#comment-68440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not an expert or anything, but I thought there was some sort of difference in the budgeting process for &quot;discretionary spending&quot; and &quot;non-discretionary spending&quot;. Perhaps we should look into why the &quot;non-discretionary spending&quot; is so high, and how to lower it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not an expert or anything, but I thought there was some sort of difference in the budgeting process for &#8220;discretionary spending&#8221; and &#8220;non-discretionary spending&#8221;. Perhaps we should look into why the &#8220;non-discretionary spending&#8221; is so high, and how to lower it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akston</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/07/17/discretionary/#comment-68437</link>
		<dc:creator>Akston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6437#comment-68437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent point!

Dollars are dollars, spending is spending.  When one is bankrupt, &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; spending should be reviewed and justified.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point!</p>
<p>Dollars are dollars, spending is spending.  When one is bankrupt, <i>all</i> spending should be reviewed and justified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
