Chew A Rolaids, Go To Jail

The War On (Some) Drugs has reached the ridiculous stage:

KISSIMMEE, Fla. — A man is suing the Kissimmee Police Department for an arrest over mints. When officers pulled Donald May over for an expired tag, they thought the mints he was chewing were crack and arrested him.

May told Eyewitness News they wouldn’t let him out of jail for three months until tests proved the so-called drugs were candy.

May said he was just minding his business, driving home from work, when a Kissimmee police officer pulled him over near 192.

“I don’t know how it occurred,” he said.

May was pulled over for an expired tag on his car. When the officer walked up to him, he noticed something white in May’s mouth. May said it was breath mints, but the officer thought it was crack cocaine.

“He took them out of my mouth and put them in a baggy and locked me up [for] possession of cocaine and tampering with evidence,” May explained.

The officer claimed he field-tested the evidence and it tested positive for drugs. The officer said he saw May buying drugs while he was stopped at an intersection. He also stated in his report May waived his Miranda rights and voluntarily admitted to buying drugs.

May said that never happened.

“My client never admitted he purchased crack cocaine. Why would he say that?” attorney Adam Sudbury said.

Obviously, he was high on antacid.

  • Justin Bowen

    Exactly how do you field-test for crack? I’m not even being accusatory or sarcastic here. I want to know how you field-test for crack.

  • John222

    They have little kits with chemicals that change colors in the presence of various drugs, it’s not rocket science. I am curious why he got a false positive. If they are going to incarcerate people for possesion of certain substances, they should be using “failproof” tests for all but the newly discovered or exotic.

  • M. Dragon

    Those tests are notoriously unreliable. They typically have large false positive rates.