<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Denmark, The Danes Recycle You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/08/23/in-denmark-the-danes-recycle-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/08/23/in-denmark-the-danes-recycle-you/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.D</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/08/23/in-denmark-the-danes-recycle-you/#comment-69079</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6676#comment-69079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not see anything in the original article requiring compulsory cremation (did I miss something there?), and I would certainly be opposed to that. However, we certainly allow cremation here in the US, as do most other countries of the world today.

This then raises two realistic questions:
1) What are you going to do with the artificial joints that do not burn?
2) Do you really want to throw away all of that heat?

Most families, in receiving the ashes of a cremated family member, will not be pleased to find an undestroyed hip replacement in with the ashes. You have to do something with this. What they have done sounds to me like a very prudent move to me. That piece of metal is not really a part of the deceased; it was only an implant.

Secondly, cremation does not simply mean putting a match to the coffin and letting it burn by itself. Considerable fuel, usually natural gas, is expended in a cremation. So there is a definite expenditure of energy from available energy sources to perform a cremation. Once it is hot gas going up the stack, is there some benefit to letting it escape with all of that energy, or might it not make sense to recover as much as can reasonably be done, just as they describe? Here again, I think they are making an intelligent move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not see anything in the original article requiring compulsory cremation (did I miss something there?), and I would certainly be opposed to that. However, we certainly allow cremation here in the US, as do most other countries of the world today.</p>
<p>This then raises two realistic questions:<br />
1) What are you going to do with the artificial joints that do not burn?<br />
2) Do you really want to throw away all of that heat?</p>
<p>Most families, in receiving the ashes of a cremated family member, will not be pleased to find an undestroyed hip replacement in with the ashes. You have to do something with this. What they have done sounds to me like a very prudent move to me. That piece of metal is not really a part of the deceased; it was only an implant.</p>
<p>Secondly, cremation does not simply mean putting a match to the coffin and letting it burn by itself. Considerable fuel, usually natural gas, is expended in a cremation. So there is a definite expenditure of energy from available energy sources to perform a cremation. Once it is hot gas going up the stack, is there some benefit to letting it escape with all of that energy, or might it not make sense to recover as much as can reasonably be done, just as they describe? Here again, I think they are making an intelligent move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Denmark, The Danes Recycle You &#171; The Earth Is Not a Trash Can</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/08/23/in-denmark-the-danes-recycle-you/#comment-69063</link>
		<dc:creator>In Denmark, The Danes Recycle You &#171; The Earth Is Not a Trash Can</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6676#comment-69063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: thelibertypapers.org [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: thelibertypapers.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmana</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/08/23/in-denmark-the-danes-recycle-you/#comment-69054</link>
		<dc:creator>tmana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6676#comment-69054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously? The most likely progression is going to be that from required-consent for postmortem organ harvesting (see the back of most US State ID&#039;s) to requiring you to to opt out if you wish your body buried intact. Then there will be limitations on the circumstances under which you may opt out, and possibly taxes and &quot;wastage fees&quot; for refusal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? The most likely progression is going to be that from required-consent for postmortem organ harvesting (see the back of most US State ID&#8217;s) to requiring you to to opt out if you wish your body buried intact. Then there will be limitations on the circumstances under which you may opt out, and possibly taxes and &#8220;wastage fees&#8221; for refusal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
