<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Reasonability Quiz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69832</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aimee,

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think if it had been a woman in the nude this wouldn’t have even been brought to the cops attention.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, that depends...  If it were a man who saw the woman, you&#039;re right that it wouldn&#039;t have been brought to the cops&#039; attention.  Pictures may have surfaced on the internet, but no law enforcement would be involved.

If it were a &lt;strong&gt;woman&lt;/strong&gt; who saw the naked woman, and the naked woman was more attractive than the viewer, I can certainly see the cops getting called.  And that little tart had it comin&#039; to her too, didn&#039;t she?

;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aimee,</p>
<blockquote><p>I think if it had been a woman in the nude this wouldn’t have even been brought to the cops attention.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, that depends&#8230;  If it were a man who saw the woman, you&#8217;re right that it wouldn&#8217;t have been brought to the cops&#8217; attention.  Pictures may have surfaced on the internet, but no law enforcement would be involved.</p>
<p>If it were a <strong>woman</strong> who saw the naked woman, and the naked woman was more attractive than the viewer, I can certainly see the cops getting called.  And that little tart had it comin&#8217; to her too, didn&#8217;t she?</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69828</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe though that as long as this guy wasn&#039;t parading in front of his window or &quot;showing his junk&quot; on purpose, it shouldn&#039;t matter what time it was. Maybe he thought with the sun you couldn&#039;t see in that well from the street.

Now, if he knew they were there, or was hoping anyone would see him that way, then there may be slight issue, but I still don&#039;t think it is a jail worthy offense. 

I think if it had been a woman in the nude this wouldn&#039;t have even been brought to the cops attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe though that as long as this guy wasn&#8217;t parading in front of his window or &#8220;showing his junk&#8221; on purpose, it shouldn&#8217;t matter what time it was. Maybe he thought with the sun you couldn&#8217;t see in that well from the street.</p>
<p>Now, if he knew they were there, or was hoping anyone would see him that way, then there may be slight issue, but I still don&#8217;t think it is a jail worthy offense. </p>
<p>I think if it had been a woman in the nude this wouldn&#8217;t have even been brought to the cops attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69823</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FWIW,

Radley Balko has posted an update on this story that raises some issues.

For one thing, it appears that the incident occurred at 8:30am, not 5:30am. 

And, the police report apparently says that the area where this guy was standing was clearly visible from common areas of the property.

Now, personally, I think this entire country is way too prudish when it comes to nudity but those facts do change things a bit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW,</p>
<p>Radley Balko has posted an update on this story that raises some issues.</p>
<p>For one thing, it appears that the incident occurred at 8:30am, not 5:30am. </p>
<p>And, the police report apparently says that the area where this guy was standing was clearly visible from common areas of the property.</p>
<p>Now, personally, I think this entire country is way too prudish when it comes to nudity but those facts do change things a bit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69818</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Aunt Bea always had a pie ready didn&#039;t she? lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Aunt Bea always had a pie ready didn&#8217;t she? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southernjames</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69816</link>
		<dc:creator>southernjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &quot;replay third down option&quot; fits in nicely with the &quot;Andy of Mayberry&quot; school of law enforcement, too. 

Sheriff Andy has to rein in Barney who wants to accuse naked Festus of being a &quot;pervert,&quot; and gets all google-eyed  - &quot;What if Thelma Lou had seen this guy - we gotta nip this in the bud, Andy, nip it in the bud!!&quot;....&quot;Now, now Barn, let me handle this.&quot; 

&quot;Okay, now look Festus, y&#039;all just can&#039;t stand around in front of open windows or doors with your clothes off, alright?  Now how hard is it to just shut the curtains?&quot;  

&quot;And Mabel. I&#039;ve told you before, you can&#039;t be cutting through people&#039;s yards.  Why just last week it was Miz Wilkenson&#039;s flower bed you walked on; she&#039;s still all riled up about her peonies...it&#039;s just got to stop, hear?&quot;  

&quot;Okay Barn, now that we got that settled, let&#039;s skedaddle and go have a piece of Aunt Bea&#039;s Rhubarb pie she just baked.&quot; 

Those old black and white half-hour sitcoms were the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;replay third down option&#8221; fits in nicely with the &#8220;Andy of Mayberry&#8221; school of law enforcement, too. </p>
<p>Sheriff Andy has to rein in Barney who wants to accuse naked Festus of being a &#8220;pervert,&#8221; and gets all google-eyed  &#8211; &#8220;What if Thelma Lou had seen this guy &#8211; we gotta nip this in the bud, Andy, nip it in the bud!!&#8221;&#8230;.&#8221;Now, now Barn, let me handle this.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;Okay, now look Festus, y&#8217;all just can&#8217;t stand around in front of open windows or doors with your clothes off, alright?  Now how hard is it to just shut the curtains?&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;And Mabel. I&#8217;ve told you before, you can&#8217;t be cutting through people&#8217;s yards.  Why just last week it was Miz Wilkenson&#8217;s flower bed you walked on; she&#8217;s still all riled up about her peonies&#8230;it&#8217;s just got to stop, hear?&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;Okay Barn, now that we got that settled, let&#8217;s skedaddle and go have a piece of Aunt Bea&#8217;s Rhubarb pie she just baked.&#8221; </p>
<p>Those old black and white half-hour sitcoms were the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69815</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, you also made good points about influence. &quot;Equal justice under law&quot; is a joke (unfortunately).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you also made good points about influence. &#8220;Equal justice under law&#8221; is a joke (unfortunately).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69814</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James, I like the replay 3rd down option best as well. Williamson should close his curtains and this woman should not cut through his yard and look into his home.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I like the replay 3rd down option best as well. Williamson should close his curtains and this woman should not cut through his yard and look into his home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69813</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brad, I’m as confused as you. From all I’ve read, there is no indication that dynamic entry on the part of the police was ever attempted in this case. Even more surprising, none of the stories I’ve read mentioned anything about the police tazering the suspect.

While I’m sure &lt;em&gt;The Badge Worshippers and Law Enforcement Bootlickers of America&lt;/em&gt;’s board appreciates the way the police handled this case, I don’t think they will get a nomination for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/18/presenting-the-latest-nominees-for-the-ramos-compean-medal-of-valor/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ramos-Compean Medal of Valor&lt;/a&gt;…the competition is just too competitive this year. 

Oh well, there’s always next year!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, I’m as confused as you. From all I’ve read, there is no indication that dynamic entry on the part of the police was ever attempted in this case. Even more surprising, none of the stories I’ve read mentioned anything about the police tazering the suspect.</p>
<p>While I’m sure <em>The Badge Worshippers and Law Enforcement Bootlickers of America</em>’s board appreciates the way the police handled this case, I don’t think they will get a nomination for the <a href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/05/18/presenting-the-latest-nominees-for-the-ramos-compean-medal-of-valor/" rel="nofollow">Ramos-Compean Medal of Valor</a>…the competition is just too competitive this year. </p>
<p>Oh well, there’s always next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William C. Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69806</link>
		<dc:creator>William C. Bradshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several recommendations would include Trudy Trespasser restricting her morning trips to public property and not shortcusts across private property (she should know the difference). The next time, deliver her son and then go back for a ebtter look at Eric.  Start a neighborhood CrimeWatch program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several recommendations would include Trudy Trespasser restricting her morning trips to public property and not shortcusts across private property (she should know the difference). The next time, deliver her son and then go back for a ebtter look at Eric.  Start a neighborhood CrimeWatch program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69803</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused...  I read Radley Balko&#039;s site on a regular basis.

Did you leave out the SWAT team busting down his door and shooting his dogs?  I find it hard to believe THAT didn&#039;t happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused&#8230;  I read Radley Balko&#8217;s site on a regular basis.</p>
<p>Did you leave out the SWAT team busting down his door and shooting his dogs?  I find it hard to believe THAT didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69801</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On answer E. Don&#039;t forget he would also have to register as a sex offender.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On answer E. Don&#8217;t forget he would also have to register as a sex offender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southernjames</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/10/21/government-reasonability-quiz/#comment-69800</link>
		<dc:creator>southernjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=6970#comment-69800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much depends on who you are and who you know, doesn&#039;t it.

C.  If the guy is a bigshot in town and/or buddies with the DA, or is a Judge, etc. 

D. See answer above, and if the guy is both pissed off at being seen, AND the woman is a nobody, and ex-wife or girlfriend or otherwise on the guy&#039;s bad side. 

I like the &quot;replay third down&quot; option the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much depends on who you are and who you know, doesn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>C.  If the guy is a bigshot in town and/or buddies with the DA, or is a Judge, etc. </p>
<p>D. See answer above, and if the guy is both pissed off at being seen, AND the woman is a nobody, and ex-wife or girlfriend or otherwise on the guy&#8217;s bad side. </p>
<p>I like the &#8220;replay third down&#8221; option the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
