<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Morning Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/12/07/monday-morning-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/12/07/monday-morning-question/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Free Market Capitalism: Good for the Environment?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/12/07/monday-morning-question/#comment-70260</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers &#187;Blog Archive &#187; Free Market Capitalism: Good for the Environment?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7231#comment-70260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Matty: http://www.realclima te.org/ Many posts here involve a discussion of the E-mails. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matty: <a href="http://www.realclima" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclima</a> te.org/ Many posts here involve a discussion of the E-mails. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/12/07/monday-morning-question/#comment-70216</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7231#comment-70216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.realclimate.org/

Many posts here involve a discussion of the E-mails.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realclimate.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/</a></p>
<p>Many posts here involve a discussion of the E-mails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TriggerFinger</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2009/12/07/monday-morning-question/#comment-70207</link>
		<dc:creator>TriggerFinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7231#comment-70207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the comments on Eric&#039;s original post (yes, all several hundred as of a few days ago).  There were links posted in the comments that attempt to answer that routine.  As I recall the answers, there were two basic ones: 
1) The code was commented out, not in use!  (That doesn&#039;t mean it wasn&#039;t in use at some point)...
2) It&#039;s common practice to &quot;adjust&quot; data as described when trying to understand how the model responds to different inputs (potentially valid, but requires an assumption of good faith).

In any event, yes some people have *tried* to answer that.  Reading their accounts I didn&#039;t feel they were particularly successful.  What&#039;s more important, though, is what the actual people involved say their answer is; speculation from third parties on this point isn&#039;t going to help nearly as much as the original programmers saying why they did that, and what model runs it may have influenced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the comments on Eric&#8217;s original post (yes, all several hundred as of a few days ago).  There were links posted in the comments that attempt to answer that routine.  As I recall the answers, there were two basic ones:<br />
1) The code was commented out, not in use!  (That doesn&#8217;t mean it wasn&#8217;t in use at some point)&#8230;<br />
2) It&#8217;s common practice to &#8220;adjust&#8221; data as described when trying to understand how the model responds to different inputs (potentially valid, but requires an assumption of good faith).</p>
<p>In any event, yes some people have *tried* to answer that.  Reading their accounts I didn&#8217;t feel they were particularly successful.  What&#8217;s more important, though, is what the actual people involved say their answer is; speculation from third parties on this point isn&#8217;t going to help nearly as much as the original programmers saying why they did that, and what model runs it may have influenced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
