<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Amendment Protects Ann Coulter, William Ayers, And The Westboro Baptist Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/03/31/the-first-amendment-protects-ann-coulter-william-ayers-and-the-westboro-baptist-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/03/31/the-first-amendment-protects-ann-coulter-william-ayers-and-the-westboro-baptist-church/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/03/31/the-first-amendment-protects-ann-coulter-william-ayers-and-the-westboro-baptist-church/#comment-71284</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7639#comment-71284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris,

If its a public institution, it&#039;s governed by the First Amendment. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>If its a public institution, it&#8217;s governed by the First Amendment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/03/31/the-first-amendment-protects-ann-coulter-william-ayers-and-the-westboro-baptist-church/#comment-71246</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7639#comment-71246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the above final note that Coulter and Ayers are idiots, perhaps that was the motivating factor why those particular institutions decided to unwelcome them (It&#039;d be for me). Isn&#039;t it their prerogative to invite and cancel? Perhaps Westboro or UW shouldn&#039;t have ever offered, but it doesn&#039;t necessarily disqualify their renigs.

There&#039;s no question anyone has the right to speak freely, but to fairly judge any institution&#039;s (public or private) decision to invite or dis invite any formal speaker, shouldn&#039;t their motive or reasoning behind it be judged i.e whether they&#039;re blocking opposing ideologies to protect their comfort zone, or even canceling due to foreseeable acrimony.

As to some state&#039;s recent legislation to block picketing at funerals, I could only agree with a law that refined jurisdictional legality with regards to public harassment.  Unfortunately, I do not foresee that to be the case, and eventually some state(s) will likely right-out ban any form of protest during funerals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the above final note that Coulter and Ayers are idiots, perhaps that was the motivating factor why those particular institutions decided to unwelcome them (It&#8217;d be for me). Isn&#8217;t it their prerogative to invite and cancel? Perhaps Westboro or UW shouldn&#8217;t have ever offered, but it doesn&#8217;t necessarily disqualify their renigs.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question anyone has the right to speak freely, but to fairly judge any institution&#8217;s (public or private) decision to invite or dis invite any formal speaker, shouldn&#8217;t their motive or reasoning behind it be judged i.e whether they&#8217;re blocking opposing ideologies to protect their comfort zone, or even canceling due to foreseeable acrimony.</p>
<p>As to some state&#8217;s recent legislation to block picketing at funerals, I could only agree with a law that refined jurisdictional legality with regards to public harassment.  Unfortunately, I do not foresee that to be the case, and eventually some state(s) will likely right-out ban any form of protest during funerals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers Blog Archive the First Amendment Protects &#8230; &#124; When You Play With Fire, You&#39;re Gonna Get Burned</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/03/31/the-first-amendment-protects-ann-coulter-william-ayers-and-the-westboro-baptist-church/#comment-71228</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers Blog Archive the First Amendment Protects &#8230; &#124; When You Play With Fire, You&#39;re Gonna Get Burned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7639#comment-71228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Bill Ayers has to say. Nonetheless, they all have a right to say it. C/P: Below The Beltway &#8230;Continue Reading&#8230;    Report This [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill Ayers has to say. Nonetheless, they all have a right to say it. C/P: Below The Beltway &#8230;Continue Reading&#8230;    Report This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
