Comments on: Contra Rand Paul: The Libertarian And Constitutional Case For The Civil Rights Act Of 1964 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/ Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time. Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: The Liberty Papers »Blog Archive » There Is No Such Thing As “State’s Rights” http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72696 The Liberty Papers »Blog Archive » There Is No Such Thing As “State’s Rights” Sat, 29 May 2010 16:08:16 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72696 [...] pretty much resolved the issue of state’s rights, and afterwords passed an amendment that significantly altered the relationship between the states and the federal government. Whatever the “rights” of the states may have been before the ratification of the 14th [...]

]]> By: VRB http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72610 VRB Mon, 24 May 2010 11:00:11 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72610 If Rachel Maddow is ignorant, Most of those born since 1960 are ignorant.

How does this explain how some lunch counters became desegregated and others didn’t in the same state? State law was not the only thing that compelled segregation. It was local custom. That was always one of the reasons brought up when Civil Rights groups tried to negotiate desegregation.

]]> By: Norm http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72605 Norm Mon, 24 May 2010 06:06:42 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72605 The best way to punish folks is economically. Deny them the ability to make a living. That is why like Matt i want racist MFrs to feel safe practicing their ignorance in the light of day for all to see so that we the people can refuse to give them any business and recognize those that do.

I find it interesting and wonder if Rachel Madow knows that Jim crow laws made it mandatory for Woolworth to deny service to blacks?

And now I now some more of the story. Thanx.

]]> By: alec http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72602 alec Mon, 24 May 2010 03:23:51 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72602 Oh, looks like you got painted as a leftist! I guess that’s what happens when you dare to admit that being black was fucking awful up until the mid-1960′s.

]]> By: Matt http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72597 Matt Sun, 23 May 2010 22:09:05 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72597 It would be better to allow businesses to discriminate based on race, orientation, gender, etc. How else will I know which businesses to reward for being inclusive or boycott for being racist? As it stands now, I don’t know who I’m giving my money to.

]]> By: Leftist or libertarian? « Foseti http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/05/23/contra-rand-paul-the-libertarian-and-constitutional-case-for-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/#comment-72596 Leftist or libertarian? « Foseti Sun, 23 May 2010 20:16:59 +0000 http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=7876#comment-72596 [...] Anyway, this leftist logic comes from . . . a libertarian. [...]

]]>