Aren’t You Glad To Be A Gamma?

I had a really interesting philosophical discussion with Brad Warbiany, our curator at The Liberty Papers, over a Facebook status I wrote. I had just re-listened to the CBS Radio Workshop rendition of Brave New World and had commented that it seemed like a far more livable situation than 1984.

Warbiany added that California, if Prop. 19 passes and allows the modern equivalent of soma to be freely ingested, the state really will look like Brave New World. With the state already self-organized into a caste system (Listen to someone from Northern California talk about Southern California or someone from Berkeley talk about Sacramento some time), abortion and every sort of contraceptive widely available and the domination of a vapid mass culture (seen at San Diego Comic Con or Wonder Con in San Francisco) taking precedence over civic involvement for Californians, the Golden State really resembles Huxley’s “negative utopia.”

Warbiany also handed me this great cartoon:
Orwell v. Huxley

On Twitter, alot of progressive and libertarian leaning activists tend to advocate alot for issues of freedom and emancipation in countries like Iran or China. In a way, situations in so obviously repressive countries like those are much easier for the activist. They fit into the Orwell dynamic and the villains and heroes are very clear. In his opposition to the death penalty, our own Stephen Littau does take on the American equivalent to state repression. Along with questionable foreign policy and drug policy, however, those are really the only avenues for passionate American political activism.

Beyond such clear issues of state force, however, one runs into a brick wall when faced with the mass culture, dullness and vapidity of consumer society. It seems that in this society, the majority of more normal people (myself and most people reading this strongly excepted) do not become Jeffersonians but instead “turn on, tune in and cop out,” as Gil Scott Heron once said. How does one become an activist in a society in which people freely subjugate, segregate and limit themselves?

I have a funny story that relates to this, that I didn’t even remember until I read what Brad said. While living in Alameda, California, I lost my phone. A teenage girl, around college age most likely, found it and called my mom, who e-mailed me about it. When I got the phone back, I was really grateful but had no money on hand. The only possession I had literally was a copy of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. I offered it to her.

She literally responded, “No thanks. I don’t read.”

I know. Alameda is not a low income area where reading should be rare, either. There are several bookstores in the area, along with hip restaurants, record stores and everything else you expect in cosmopolitan society. It even has an incredible vintage movie theatre that I rank as the best in Northern California, next to Oakland’s Grand Lake Theatre. This girl was obviously more involved in other factors of modern life, all of which I can safely assume are of less consequence intellectually than the work of Huxley.

It’s especially ironic given that there is a passage in Brave New World in which infants are given books while bombarded with screeching, loud noises, in order to dissuade them from being too intellectual when they reach adulthood. With video games, television, the internet and iPhones, that seems unnecessary as modern people have been incentivized out of intellectualism.

That girl did go to extra trouble to give me my phone back, with no advantage to her, however. That means she had a decency and sense of altruism that her lack of reading hadn’t impeded. Having grown up around the hyper-educated and being on that road myself, I can also attest that we’re not the nicest group of people. Perhaps then we really are on the road to progress.

  • Procopius

    omfg, this little comic presentation was actually amazing. Turns out the future holds a mixture of both worlds. Totally sucks too.

  • Akston

    Given that the phrase bread and circuses was coined nearly 2000 years ago, this trend doesn’t seem to be very new. But I agree that it’s still very much in play.

    While this cycle may be ongoing, perhaps one way to resist the trend is to use media like the internet to discuss these issues and offer alternative perspectives to the status quo – like libertarian values.

  • Pingback: The Crossed Pond » Huxley, Not Orwell, Had it Right()

  • Rather

    Predicting the future is fascinating but If it is a mixture of both worlds, then they must cancel each other out. Doesn’t it mean a happy medium exists?

  • Chris

    Great cartoons- very well done.

    I don’t want to underestimate the likelihood of either an Orwellian or Huxleyian state, but I do question just how far down those roads we are.

    When we criticize our society for being a mass-media, iphone using, gossip listening, etc etc society, One: consider if, technology & communication systems aside, if there really is a fundamental difference from the past and, Two: we tend to reflect on the negatives.

    For instance, it is easy to listen to the news or TV shows and get the feeling “what is the world going to” (I know I do often), but that is in part fundamentally flawed perspective. I’m sure many look at what’s on TV and directly portray that as being our society, and while it does reflect it to a sometimes large degree, is not the whole picture.

    Take one of those cartoons, the man waiting for the lottery numbers. What inherently is there to be pessimistic about? A man, who in a free market, wants to gamble a little. He probably got done working 10 hrs and is relaxing, watching some tube, and waiting for the lotto numbers he plays once or twice a month. Given that depiction, are we really watering down our sense of humanity.

    I do see it from both sides however, and there is plenty to be said of both Orwell and Huxley, and this was a great piece. But just some words of caution to not dwell on the negative side.

  • Pingback: Britblog Roundup #285 | Amused Cynicism()