<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuba banned Michael Moore&#8217;s &#8220;Sicko&#8221; for fear of public backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/12/17/cuba-banned-michael-moores-sicko-for-fear-of-public-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/12/17/cuba-banned-michael-moores-sicko-for-fear-of-public-backlash/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarran</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/12/17/cuba-banned-michael-moores-sicko-for-fear-of-public-backlash/#comment-75867</link>
		<dc:creator>tarran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=8829#comment-75867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, in fact the Cuban government showed Sicko on TV.

Apparently the notion that the propaganda was too crude for Cuba, was actually based on a review of the film written by a Cuban ex-pat doctor, who &lt;em&gt;speculated&lt;/em&gt; that even the Castro regime wouldn&#039;t dare to put such a blatantly false rosy picture of the Cuban health care system.  Unfortunately, this speculation was converted to &#039;fact&#039; by some other bloggers who then fooled a few tens of people, including whomever wrote that cable.

This item does, however, point out how utterly worthless governments are; this is the same tripe that Russian spy ring here in Mass were sending to their masters back in the capital in an attempt to justify their pay.

That the Cuban govt might ban it is somewhat plausible to those of us who are aware of famous propaganda blunders; back in the 40&#039;s (I think) the Soviet Union decided to show a movie version of &lt;em&gt;the Grapes of Wrath&lt;/em&gt; in an attempt to show how heartless capitalism was. It backfired; the Russians learned that in the U.S. the poor had cars, something that even the relatively well off couldn&#039;t afford in the workers paradise.

On the other hand, as Russ pointed out, storming out of a meeting with the party is a great way to earn a one way trip to a prison in Cuba. That was a the reason why I thought the story was a bit fishy when I first heard it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in fact the Cuban government showed Sicko on TV.</p>
<p>Apparently the notion that the propaganda was too crude for Cuba, was actually based on a review of the film written by a Cuban ex-pat doctor, who <em>speculated</em> that even the Castro regime wouldn&#8217;t dare to put such a blatantly false rosy picture of the Cuban health care system.  Unfortunately, this speculation was converted to &#8216;fact&#8217; by some other bloggers who then fooled a few tens of people, including whomever wrote that cable.</p>
<p>This item does, however, point out how utterly worthless governments are; this is the same tripe that Russian spy ring here in Mass were sending to their masters back in the capital in an attempt to justify their pay.</p>
<p>That the Cuban govt might ban it is somewhat plausible to those of us who are aware of famous propaganda blunders; back in the 40&#8242;s (I think) the Soviet Union decided to show a movie version of <em>the Grapes of Wrath</em> in an attempt to show how heartless capitalism was. It backfired; the Russians learned that in the U.S. the poor had cars, something that even the relatively well off couldn&#8217;t afford in the workers paradise.</p>
<p>On the other hand, as Russ pointed out, storming out of a meeting with the party is a great way to earn a one way trip to a prison in Cuba. That was a the reason why I thought the story was a bit fishy when I first heard it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/12/17/cuba-banned-michael-moores-sicko-for-fear-of-public-backlash/#comment-75866</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=8829#comment-75866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has been proved false. Didn&#039;t the idea of doctors storming out of a government showing of the film in protest raise any red flags for you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been proved false. Didn&#8217;t the idea of doctors storming out of a government showing of the film in protest raise any red flags for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: procopius</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/12/17/cuba-banned-michael-moores-sicko-for-fear-of-public-backlash/#comment-75857</link>
		<dc:creator>procopius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=8829#comment-75857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s odd, wasn&#039;t Sicko supposed to have presented a pro-socialized medicine case?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s odd, wasn&#8217;t Sicko supposed to have presented a pro-socialized medicine case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
