<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Republicans Fight Gas Tax Renewal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/08/02/should-republicans-fight-gas-tax-renewal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/08/02/should-republicans-fight-gas-tax-renewal/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/08/02/should-republicans-fight-gas-tax-renewal/#comment-78210</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=9538#comment-78210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doc Hylento,

Your comment seems long on conjecture and short on substance.  Can you explain exactly what would need to occur to have $6/gallon gas without punitive taxation?

Also, you do realize that a $0.50/gal increase coupled with an income tax cut in the gas tax is highly regressive, right?  Not that I&#039;m complaining, of course, because I think it&#039;d be a net decrease in total taxes *for me*, but I have a feeling that low-income people who pay almost no federal income taxes today will be a little &quot;annoyed&quot; at the rise in their transportation budget...

Phil,

My preference would also be to cut the ethanol mandate &amp; subsidy.  Republicans won&#039;t dare do it, though, because of their support in farm states.  I left it out of the original post because it&#039;s a political non-starter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc Hylento,</p>
<p>Your comment seems long on conjecture and short on substance.  Can you explain exactly what would need to occur to have $6/gallon gas without punitive taxation?</p>
<p>Also, you do realize that a $0.50/gal increase coupled with an income tax cut in the gas tax is highly regressive, right?  Not that I&#8217;m complaining, of course, because I think it&#8217;d be a net decrease in total taxes *for me*, but I have a feeling that low-income people who pay almost no federal income taxes today will be a little &#8220;annoyed&#8221; at the rise in their transportation budget&#8230;</p>
<p>Phil,</p>
<p>My preference would also be to cut the ethanol mandate &#038; subsidy.  Republicans won&#8217;t dare do it, though, because of their support in farm states.  I left it out of the original post because it&#8217;s a political non-starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/08/02/should-republicans-fight-gas-tax-renewal/#comment-78209</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=9538#comment-78209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Brian that something should be made of the attempt to renew the gasoline tax. And I also agree that expanded drilling is a possibility as are the green energy subsidies (ethanol, e.g.). My preferred thing to cut would be the ethanol mandate and subsidy.
I do not understand Doctor Hylento&#039;s claim of military spending subsidies. I suppose I simply have not studied the situation enough. Perhaps, Doctor, you could expand on that fact? I also would appreciate your explaining your phrase &quot;at least people would see the reality of their addiction&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brian that something should be made of the attempt to renew the gasoline tax. And I also agree that expanded drilling is a possibility as are the green energy subsidies (ethanol, e.g.). My preferred thing to cut would be the ethanol mandate and subsidy.<br />
I do not understand Doctor Hylento&#8217;s claim of military spending subsidies. I suppose I simply have not studied the situation enough. Perhaps, Doctor, you could expand on that fact? I also would appreciate your explaining your phrase &#8220;at least people would see the reality of their addiction&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Hylento</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/08/02/should-republicans-fight-gas-tax-renewal/#comment-78203</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Hylento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=9538#comment-78203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish they&#039;d slap an extra 50 cents to the gallon - and then lower something else, like income tax, to compensate.

We desperately need new infrastructure.  And not just roads, we need better rail transportation  or we&#039;re really going to be a 3rd world country in a generation or so.

The price of gas is already artificially low - subsidized by military spending mostly.  Give us fairly priced gas and it would be $6 a gallon overnight - but at least people would see the reality of their addiction!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they&#8217;d slap an extra 50 cents to the gallon &#8211; and then lower something else, like income tax, to compensate.</p>
<p>We desperately need new infrastructure.  And not just roads, we need better rail transportation  or we&#8217;re really going to be a 3rd world country in a generation or so.</p>
<p>The price of gas is already artificially low &#8211; subsidized by military spending mostly.  Give us fairly priced gas and it would be $6 a gallon overnight &#8211; but at least people would see the reality of their addiction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
