<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote Of The Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/03/29/quote-of-the-day-194/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/03/29/quote-of-the-day-194/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/03/29/quote-of-the-day-194/#comment-84278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=10296#comment-84278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth, I think there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; such a thing as &quot;judicial activism&quot;, but you&#039;re right that the term has been abused beyond all recognition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I think there <i>is</i> such a thing as &#8220;judicial activism&#8221;, but you&#8217;re right that the term has been abused beyond all recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Littau</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/03/29/quote-of-the-day-194/#comment-84272</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Littau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=10296#comment-84272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I remember when conservatives were complaining about “judicial activism” when SCOTUS refused to get involved in the Terri Schiavo drama. SCOTUS basically said that this was a matter for Florida to deal with; not their call. If anything this was a case of judicial restraint (and IMO SCOTUS made the right call here). 

I’ve reached the same conclusion that “judicial activism” depends entirely on whose ox is being gored. It’s one of the most dishonest political terms in the national debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I remember when conservatives were complaining about “judicial activism” when SCOTUS refused to get involved in the Terri Schiavo drama. SCOTUS basically said that this was a matter for Florida to deal with; not their call. If anything this was a case of judicial restraint (and IMO SCOTUS made the right call here). </p>
<p>I’ve reached the same conclusion that “judicial activism” depends entirely on whose ox is being gored. It’s one of the most dishonest political terms in the national debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
