<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milton Friedman on Libertarianism and Humility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/04/13/milton-friedman-on-libertarianism-and-humility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/04/13/milton-friedman-on-libertarianism-and-humility/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/04/13/milton-friedman-on-libertarianism-and-humility/#comment-84542</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=10391#comment-84542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Easy enough to say &quot;I could be wrong&quot; as a reason for non-coercion. However, far too many statists are incapable of believing that they themselves could be wrong, which they then use to justify coercion.

It&#039;s been my sad experience to have met someone, a public school teacher in fact, who was convinced that &quot;something must be done, this is something, so this must be done.&quot; And that &quot;something&quot; was not presented as a moral or ethical imperative, but was to have been &quot;imprisoned for life for first degree murder&quot; verdict against another human being.

Humility, as Friedman presents it, seems as rare in humanity as any other virtue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy enough to say &#8220;I could be wrong&#8221; as a reason for non-coercion. However, far too many statists are incapable of believing that they themselves could be wrong, which they then use to justify coercion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been my sad experience to have met someone, a public school teacher in fact, who was convinced that &#8220;something must be done, this is something, so this must be done.&#8221; And that &#8220;something&#8221; was not presented as a moral or ethical imperative, but was to have been &#8220;imprisoned for life for first degree murder&#8221; verdict against another human being.</p>
<p>Humility, as Friedman presents it, seems as rare in humanity as any other virtue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorT</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/04/13/milton-friedman-on-libertarianism-and-humility/#comment-84457</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=10391#comment-84457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see how humility and tolerance are interconnected. A proud, arrogant person can be tolerant of others. A humble person can be bigoted and intolerant.

What Milton Friedman and you (Steve Littau) described was not humility but the recognition that you are not omniscient. Awareness that one can be wrong or ignorant about many topics may help one to be tolerant, but it doesn&#039;t guarantee it. I know people who readily admit they don&#039;t know everything and aren&#039;t always right but are intolerant of homosexuals, atheists, recreational drug users, or other groups or categories of people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how humility and tolerance are interconnected. A proud, arrogant person can be tolerant of others. A humble person can be bigoted and intolerant.</p>
<p>What Milton Friedman and you (Steve Littau) described was not humility but the recognition that you are not omniscient. Awareness that one can be wrong or ignorant about many topics may help one to be tolerant, but it doesn&#8217;t guarantee it. I know people who readily admit they don&#8217;t know everything and aren&#8217;t always right but are intolerant of homosexuals, atheists, recreational drug users, or other groups or categories of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
