<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Basic Premise Behind Campaign Finance Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/10/31/the-basic-premise-behind-campaign-finance-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/10/31/the-basic-premise-behind-campaign-finance-laws/</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Property. Defending individual freedom and liberty, one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/10/31/the-basic-premise-behind-campaign-finance-laws/#comment-89142</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=11048#comment-89142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris,

Great post...  I think it really well describes the view of the media and the public on campaign finance law...

...but I think it leaves out the reason that &lt;strong&gt;elected officials and the major parties&lt;/strong&gt; are in such strong favor of limiting electoral speech: they want the forum to themselves.

They want the ability to control the message and exclude everything outside of it.  That was a huge portion of McCain-Feingold, and the restriction on issue ads within 60 days prior to an election.  

The leftists want to keep corporate speech out of elections; the pols just want to keep any speech but their own out of elections.  Neither one is acceptable to a free society.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Great post&#8230;  I think it really well describes the view of the media and the public on campaign finance law&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;but I think it leaves out the reason that <strong>elected officials and the major parties</strong> are in such strong favor of limiting electoral speech: they want the forum to themselves.</p>
<p>They want the ability to control the message and exclude everything outside of it.  That was a huge portion of McCain-Feingold, and the restriction on issue ads within 60 days prior to an election.  </p>
<p>The leftists want to keep corporate speech out of elections; the pols just want to keep any speech but their own out of elections.  Neither one is acceptable to a free society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricketson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/10/31/the-basic-premise-behind-campaign-finance-laws/#comment-89139</link>
		<dc:creator>ricketson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=11048#comment-89139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW, I think that the solution to our non-democratic information network is to build a democratic system from the ground up, not to try to reform a structurally undemocratic infrastructure (especially not by state regulation, which is inherently undemocratic).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I think that the solution to our non-democratic information network is to build a democratic system from the ground up, not to try to reform a structurally undemocratic infrastructure (especially not by state regulation, which is inherently undemocratic).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricketson</title>
		<link>http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2012/10/31/the-basic-premise-behind-campaign-finance-laws/#comment-89138</link>
		<dc:creator>ricketson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelibertypapers.org/?p=11048#comment-89138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many of the proponents of campaign spending restrictions are just political opportunists, there is also a sincere concern based on theories of democracy. Unfortunately, the first group includes the most prominent advocates -- professional politicians and partisan hacks. They just want to diminish the influence of their political opposition.

I&#039;ll try to describe a democratic theory of information networks on my blog when I get a chance, and link to this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many of the proponents of campaign spending restrictions are just political opportunists, there is also a sincere concern based on theories of democracy. Unfortunately, the first group includes the most prominent advocates &#8212; professional politicians and partisan hacks. They just want to diminish the influence of their political opposition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to describe a democratic theory of information networks on my blog when I get a chance, and link to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
